News

Data about the Activity of Moldovan Commercial Banks on April 30, 2026Tarmo SILD: Energbank has been profitable ever since it came under the ownership of Iute GroupThe MDL mirrors the EUR volatility: Moldovan economy adjusts to new realityInflation “not by the book,” or Welcome to the crisis? The National Bank increases banks' share of equity capital in their operating activitiesIs the National Bank “financing” the state budget to the detriment of the economy? And what do the IMF and commercial banks have to do with it?Inflationary measures amid high inflation, or anticipation of the National Bank of Moldova's Stop-and-Go policyDr. Sándor Csány: Being the 4th largest, OTP in Moldova will grow both organically as well as through possible mergers and acquisitions It seems to be a place, but it is notScott HOCKLANDER: For me, the persistence of Moldovan citizens is not only a learned lesson, but also a great exampleSorin MASLO: "The year 2022 was a turning point for the "Cricova" Wine Combine, the turnover increased by almost 25%"Deposit rates are at their peak. Market conjuncture or Why banks need individuals’ depositsValeriu LAZĂR: "If the state does not support business today, tomorrow it will have no one to collect taxes from.Chisinau Airport as a reflection of statehoodMonetary measures against non-monetary inflationBanks as the fulcrum of the economy: they have increased profits and are preparing for the challenges of the 2H 2022The Ministry of Finance and investors in the State Securities market at the peak of placement volumesThe banking market: turmoil and increased demand. No panicIs Moldova ready for the economic consequences of the war in the neighboring country?Are we heading for hyperinflation? It all depends on the correct diagnosis and the prescribed treatmentWhat is happening in the Government Securities Market and what does the National Bank have to do with it?The wine industry is on the verge of a revolution: Is the industry-specific law bankrupting enterprises? The trap for the oil products marketLászló DIÓSI: Foreign investments come to Moldova due to banking system stabilityWhen there is no program with the IMF, we issue are government securities ...Nikolay BORISSOV: “Acquisition of Moldindconbank is the best procurement in the Moldovan market, albeit the most risky one”Oil Ping Pong GamesBanking 2020 - pandemic, profitableWeird 2020: humility, depression, rebellion, accepting a new realityThe Hunger Games of the foreign exchange marketHow to tame liquidity?Veaceslav IONITA: The government killed the business, but flirted with the populationPeople and Business: Natural and Unnatural SelectionAlexandru BURDEINII: Being ethical becomes vital in business nowadaysMoldova’s Key Macroeconomic IndicatorsPrices at filling stations

The Prima Casa program needs reform, as it currently creates a long-term burden on public finances and drives price increases in the market – IPRE

The Prima Casa program needs reform, as it currently creates a long-term burden on public finances and drives price increases in the market – IPRE

This is stated in the analytical note "What Should the Future Prima Casa Program Look Like?" prepared by the Institute for European Policies and Reforms (IPRE), in the context of the suspension of the state mortgage program's compensation component after the annual budget of 130 million lei was exhausted in just three months. IPRE believes the problem is not due to a lack of budgetary funds, but to the need to reform the program, which has expanded significantly over its eight years of operation and is creating a long-term burden on public finances. IPRE expert Stanislav Ghilețchi notes that the program has generally achieved its goals, contributing to the development of the mortgage lending market and helping thousands of families acquire housing. However, according to the author, the continued operation of the program in its current form risks transforming the social policy instrument into a mechanism for general support of demand in the real estate market. Since the program's launch, over 8,000 residential properties have been purchased, and approximately 6,400 beneficiaries continue to receive monthly compensation. Moreover, in the second quarter of 2025, the Prima Casa Plus program accounted for more than half of the new mortgage contracts issued by banks, which, according to IPRE, indicates that the program has expanded beyond its initial target beneficiaries. The expert warns that the current compensation costs the state approximately 150 million lei annually and will remain in effect for another 20-30 years. The program, in its current format, is driving up housing prices, as stimulating demand against a backdrop of limited supply drives up real estate prices. For example, the Residential Real Estate Price Index (RPPI) reached 226.7% in the fourth quarter of 2025, an increase of 26.8% compared to the previous year. Another issue is the expanding circle of beneficiaries, including those in the liberal professions and buyers of homes priced up to 2.5 million lei, which already falls within the mid- to upper-middle-class market segment. The expert recommends refocusing the Prima Casa program on a limited number of priority categories of citizens, abandoning the monthly compensation mechanism, and reinstating a more conservative level of debt burden. Specifically, it is proposed to maintain state support primarily for young families with three or more children, as well as public sector employees in sectors with chronic labor shortages, such as education and healthcare. In his opinion, it is for these categories that state participation has a clear socio-economic justification. Instead of capping housing prices, the experts recommend introducing an income threshold for program participants, calculated as a multiple of the average salary in the economy, with automatic annual adjustments based on data from the National Statistics Bureau. It is assumed that in this case, the acceptable level of debt burden will determine the affordable price of housing. It is also proposed to abandon the monthly mortgage compensation and replace it with a one-time grant for the down payment. IPRE also believes the 2024 decision to increase the maximum debt burden from 50% to 70% of net family income is a mistake – this level makes households more vulnerable to job loss, rising interest rates, or unexpected expenses, including medical ones, and therefore proposes returning it to its previous level. // 09.06.2026 - InfoMarket

News on the subject